Wedding in Galilee / Urs al-Jalil, Palestine, France, Belgium 1987

This film is screening on Sunday at the Picture House as part of the Leeds Palestinian Film Festival. It was the first feature film shot by a Palestinian film-maker, Michel Khleifi, in occupied Palestine. Galilee is in what passes for the Israeli state and this drama is set before the 1967 war and the extension of the occupation to the Gaza, West Bank,and territory in Lebanon and Syria.

This a different world from that when the film was produced, just before the First Intifada; and very different from the Zionist campaign of genocide, ethnic cleansing and assaults on neighbouring peoples.

The wedding of the title is of the son of a village Mukhtar [head man]. His village is under martial law and he has to seek permission from the local Military Governor who agrees on condition that he and his aides can attend the ceremony.

Most of the film is taken up with the ceremony; a rich tapestry of Palestinian traditions, both Christian and Muslim. But the tensions caused by the presence of the occupiers exacerbates divisions within the Palestinian community. As the day progresses both personal and communal conflicts reach a climax.

This is a fine piece of film-making, actually shot in villages around Nazareth and the nearby West Bank. The complex narrative not only explores the contradictions of the occupation but also presents the import of the land to Palestinians and the important role that women play in resistance.

There is an excellent article on the film by Ella Shohat in the Middle East Information and Research Project from 1988. And two guests will be illuminating the film after the screening. The film is being projected from a 16mm print in colour, widescreen and with English sub-titles. There is also a review with much of the film’s plot discussed.

Review: Anora (2024)

Don’t forget you can join us in the bar after the 5pm screening to talk about Anora and other films at our First Thursday Film Club.

Writer-director Sean Baker has returned with his latest film, Anora. After winning the Palme d’Or at Cannes Film Festival earlier this year, alongside its initial reception, Anora has easily become one of the most anticipated films of 2024. After waiting for its release for what seemed like forever, I was more than ready to attend the first showing at the Picture House.

Mikey Madison gives a phenomenal, standout performance in the titular role that lingers long after the film ends. The starry-eyed Anora, who prefers Ani, is a 23 year old sex worker who dances in a Manhattan strip club. It is here that she meets Ivan or Vanya (Mark Eydelshteyn), the unfledged son of a wealthy Russian oligarch. Vanya soon makes Ani a business proposal à la Pretty Woman to be his girlfriend for the week. Enticed by the payout and by his life of frivolous excess, she agrees. Ani begins to fall for Vanya and her character is initiated into his world through head-spinning, reeling romantic montage. After their impromptu marriage (set to an unexpectedly moving needledrop), Ani believes this to be her golden ticket out of the club for good. Hopeful, uplifted and disarmed, we are enticed into the fantasy alongside Ani – tantalised by the prospect of a better life.

Once Vanya’s parents hear the news of the pair’s nuptials in Russia and of Ani’s profession, they set out to annul the marriage with the help of their associate Toros, flawlessly portrayed by Baker’s long-time collaborator Karren Karagulian. The film descends further into chaos when events lead Ani to assist Toros, his brother Garnick (Vache Tovmasyan) and gentle henchman Igor (Yuriy Borisov) in a manhunt for Vanya. As the foursome embark on a voyage through the streets of Brooklyn, the night tailspins into a sobering series of events, emphasised by flash cuts and overlapping, clamorous New York accents – reminiscent of the Safdie brothers’ Good Time (2017) or Uncut Gems (2019).

Baker is no stranger to this kind of storytelling. As seen in preceding titles Starlet (2012) and Tangerine (2015), the stories of sex workers are often at the forefront of his work. Baker’s films are typically structured as comprehensive character studies, employing realism to authentically explore the human condition as it relates to poverty, class, and living on the margins of American society. Anora is no doubt a continuation of this style and these themes, however confronts wealth and apathy in a way not before seen in these earlier titles.

Anora deconstructs the rags to riches trope with brutal honesty. The film is a tragicomedy akin to life itself, finding glints of light in its darkest moments. Amidst the calamity, the cast preserve a tactful, comedic tone that cuts through the bleakness. Ani, beneath her glittering exterior and professional persona, is a gritty, wilful and fierce character, able to hold her own in otherwise distressing circumstances. Her determination to escape a life of poverty propels the narrative forward. As though it were a survival instinct, she remains unrelenting in her own self-assurance and preservation, refusing to loosen the grip on her American dream until the bitter end.

Exhilarating, tender and utterly captivating, Anora is definitely one that you won’t want to miss on the big screen.

Sophie Laing

Now showing at the Picture House and as part of Leeds International Film Festival and the Friend’s First Thursday Meetup will be taking place after the 5pm screening on the 7th November

Mirch Masala, India 1987

This title is part of a retrospective of films featuring Smita Patil. She was an important and successful actress in the sub-continent from the mid 1970s until the late 1980s; she died only aged 31 in 1987.

Many of her best films were part of India’s parallel cinema; a counter cinema to the mainstream cinemas of which the Mumbai / ‘Bollywood’ is the best known. These films were closer to art cinema, often consciously critical and even revolutionary and eschewing the melodrama, songs and dances that epitomize the dominant film mode. Patil worked with a number of major parallel cinema directors, including the best-known Shyam Benegal and Mrinal Sen.

This movie was directed by Ketan Mehta and co-written with Chunilal Madia, adapted from one of his Gujarat short stories. The story is set in a small village in 1930s British colonial India. It is not clear if this is an area directly ruled by the British or is a part of one of the supposedly independent kingdom’s or principalities.

The village is visited by a Subedar [tax collector] with his accompanying troop of armed horsemen.

Such tax collectors were noted not just for the brutal way they enforced collection but in addition taking village valuables, resources and even women for their own use. In this case the visiting Subedar (Naseeruddin Shah) is taken with Sonbai (Smita Patil), the wife of Shankar who leaves the village to work on the Railway, that iconic network in the subcontinent and Indian Cinema. The village is divided by caste and the village Mukhi (leader – Suresh Oberoi) seems to have exploited and stolen the land of the poorer members through usury.

The women from poorer households work nearby sorting and processing red peppers, a site known as the factory. The title of the film translates as ‘Hot Spice’ and the peppers function as an actual and symbolic prop in the drama. Indeed the movie is saturated with the colour red. There is little sign of the men of the village involving in work and they clearly dominate and restrict the women.

Two sub-plots in the narrative involve the wife of the Mukhi, Saraswati (Deepti Naval) attempting to enrol her daughter Munni in the local school. The school master (Benjamin Gilani) is a lone follower of Gandhi in the village. Meanwhile the Mukhi’s younger brother (Mohan Gokhale) wants to elope with Radhu (Supriya Pathak) but her lower caste stands in their way.

The Subedar threatens the village men with reprisals if he cannot lay hands on Sonbai. The only resistance is by the school master: Abu, the watchman at the factory: and some of the fellow women of Sonbai in the village.

This is a powerful drama which dramatises both the sexist structure of the society and the repressive weight of the colonial occupation; though we never see or hear the British colonial authority. Patil is excellent as are her fellow actresses as the village women. The players of the male characters have minor roles, except for Om Puri as Abu and with the Subedar larger than anyone or even life. The film follows the style associated with the spaghetti western, which was very influential in Indian film in the 1970s and 1980s: as with the star vehicles of Amitabh Bachchan like Sholay (1975).

This was a screening of a digital transfer; there do not seem to be any 35mm prints, either in this programme of in the Festival itself. The quality was good and the important colours looked fine. It was shot in 1.66:1, in Hindi and has English sub-titles. The running time was given as 128 minutes, but I thought it was more like 120 minutes: Movie Database gives 121 minutes.

Unfortunately this is the only title of the five in the retrospective screening at the Picture House. Indeed, the number of Festival titles here seems down on 2023 and that year was lower than the pre-pandemic era. Given that the Festival originally started at the cinema, along with the development of the Friends, I find this disappointing.

First Thursday Film Club: Anora

For November’s ‘First Thursday’ Film Club on the 7th November we’ll be meeting in the bar after the 5pm showing of Anora in screen 2. Anora is the latest film from Sean Baker (TangerineThe Florida Project) and won the Palme d’Or at Cannes Film Festival. It’s screening at the Picture House from Friday 1st November and is also one of the many films showing at the Leeds International Film Festival. If you can’t make the screening on the 7th and want to see the film some other time you’d still be welcome to join us around 7:30pm. Meeting at the end of the first week of the Festival should also mean we have plenty of other great films to talk about.

“Watching Anora is like riding shotgun alongside a reckless driver. Sean Baker is one of the brightest and most original filmmakers of his generation. He is one of a kind, and so is Anora.” – Leonard Maltin

“A wildly entertaining, modern-day screwball comedy set in 2018 that barrels through New York and Las Vegas. Mikey Madison is a revelation.” – Wendy Ide, Screen International

The film is showing every day from Friday so we hope you will get chance to see it and then join us on Thursday to talk about it.

Book Tickets

Strange Darling (2024)

Strange Darling completely shatters every expectation you might have of what initially seems to be a fairly cut and dry serial killer film: every chapter completely rips the carpet out from under what you think is going on between Willa Fitzgerald (The Lady) and Kyle Gallner (The Demon). Is it a one night stand gone horribly wrong? Is it some kinky game gone astray? 2024 has brought us some of the blandest films imaginable, so it’s refreshing to see a film from a director who is in full command of his craft and can play with the audience like a puppet-master.

The film marks both the debut of long-time actor Giovanni Ribisi as a cameraman, and the most exciting new voice in American independent cinema with JT Mollner. This is Mollner’s second film after the western Outlaws and Angels, which premiered at Sundance in 2016.

Non-linear structures can be a crutch to mask a filmmaker’s failings, but with Strange Darling it’s all about the twists and turns, which are carefully calculated with each reveal during the film’s six chapters. It’s a really impressive movie. Both of the leads have been a round for a while. Fitzgerald is mainly known for her TV work in the Scream TV series and Netflix’s Fall of the House of Usher. Gallner already has a bit of a cult following, starting with Jennifer’s Body but more recently the Scream sequel/reboot, Smile and Dinner In America. Both give star making performances and if there was any justice in the world Fitzgerald would be a nominated for a Oscar…. she won’t. 

Mollner had to fight like hell to get final cut on the film after Miramax recut it (and this is the post-Weinstein Miramax!)—but after Tiffany Haddish advocated on Mollner’s behalf with Miramax CEO Bill Block and a contractually obligated test screening of Mollner’s cut, Miramax relented and Block actually personally apologised to Moller for his trouble. When you see the film, the idea that somebody could think a linear version would possibly work will baffle you.

There hasn’t been a film yet with this kind of strong depiction of the state of Oregon since Gus van Sant’s early films, even though films are shot there all the time like the Twilight films for example. The Mt. Hood territory where the film is set is prime Sasquatch country (Mt. Hood is the hotspot for sightings). It’s home to two eccentric hippie doomsday preppers—although Ed Begley’s character wants it to be known he was a biker not a hippie—with whom The Lady seeks refugee, so of course he asks her if she is sure it’s not the ‘Squatches after her. The film depicts the strange and vast Oregon woodlands, a place full of ‘Squatches, hippies, preppers, white supremacists and yes, even serial killers (Ted Bundy and the Green River Killer both operated in Oregon). It’s not hard to believe that Sasquatches and serial killers can run rampant there. 

Also, in a world where there is much too much mediocrity shot digitally, it’s refreshing to Strange Darling proudly proclaiming that it was “shot entirely on 35MM” the moment the company credits end at the beginning of the film. Just don’t try the preppers choice of breakfast you might gag when you see the film. 

Ian Schultz

Strange Darling is showing on Saturday 19th and Wednesday 23rd October at 20:40

The Outrun (2024)

For October’s First Thursday Film Club we’ll be watching The Outrun at 5pm on Thursday 3rd and then gathering in the bar for a chat to share our feelings on the film, or about film in general, from around 7:30pm. First Thursdays are a new meet-up organised by the Friends of Hyde Park Picture House but open to everyone.

Starring and produced by Saoirse Ronan, and adapted from the bestselling memoir by Amy Liptrot, The Outrun is a life-affirming story about living on the edge, healing and what it means to return home.

“This is beautiful filmmaking. This is cinema where everything matters, where every little detail adds up to create something seriously exhilarating to experience in the theater.” – Alex Billington, FirstShowing.net

“The Outrun’s true tether, however, is Ronan, and here she works to all her greatest strengths. The film wraps entirely around her, yet she’s far too honest an actor to ever play up to the audience’s expectations of a woman in crisis.” – Clarisse Loughrey, Independent

The film is showing every day this week so we hope you will get chance to see it and then join us on Thursday to talk about it.

Book Tickets

Lee, Britain / USA / Norway / Australia / Ireland / Singapore – 2023.

This is a biopic of the photo-journalist Lee Miller, [full biography on Wikipedia]. In this feature she is played in a fine performance by Kate Winslet. Winslet is also the co-producer and worked closely with the writers and first-time-director Ellen Kuras, previously known for her work as a cinematographer. The movie enjoys a fine production with a strong supporting cast.

The film opens in the 1930s when Lee Miller was transitioning from a model to a photographer. She collaborated for a time with Man Ray and was also his lover. We see and hear some of the surrealist circle though who is who is unclear, [unless you watch the captioned version]. Lee Miller was a ‘free spirit’ but this and her relationships are only partly presented.

The movie concentrates on the World War II period when Lee worked for the British edition of Vogue. She usually worked with a Rolleiflex camera, a larger format and less compact than the Leica camera many other photographer used: one of these being the U.S. Dick Scherman (Andy Sandberg). After distinctive work on the British home front Lee was able to accompany U.S. Forces in the campaign in Europe after D-Day. As with the British her gender restricted her access but she firmly resisted this. Her most famous works were the photographs she took of the camps and victims of the Third Reich’s holocaust. These were censured in Britain but finally appeared in the U.S. edition of Vogue. The form of the narrative is an interview where particular and famous photographs by Lee provide references for a series of flashbacks. The interview and the use of photographs works well.

However, the writers have also attempted to make the interview a quest, not just for Lee’s career, but also her character and motivation and I found this aspect a little unsatisfactory.

Still it is a fine and powerful study. The production design, cinematography and editing are all excellent. The features is in colour and 1.85.1, running just under two hours. The dialogue is in English and French with appropriate sub-titles. This is definitely worth seeing and Lee’s biography is an fascinating study of a pioneering women and a period.

Review: Not A Rock-Doc

 
“If you can remember the 70s, you weren’t there!” A quote very freely adapted from Timothy Leary, or was it Pete Townsend, or maybe even Robin Williams, when commenting on the 60s …  to be honest I’m actually not sure who said it. Anyway they were two tremendously creative decades in rock history. We still have the recordings, some films of concerts, and some ageing rockers are still touring. But what was life really like for a band like Sharks on the edge of the big-time? They made good music and were signed to Island Records. They even had a shark-shaped car. What could possibly go wrong? 

Fortunately their frontman Steve (Snips) Parsons is also a filmmaker. Despite a very limited budget Steve, along with Anke Trojan, made Not a Rock-Doc to share his experience of the ups and downs of being in a working band. As the film title says this is not a traditional documentary. What we have here is a series of impressions of people, places and sounds, some fleeting, drawn from hours of film footage. We meet other band members, in particular accomplished guitarist Chris Spedding. The film touches on the formation of Sharks in 1972, the people, the glamour, the top musicians, the American tour, the albums, the rise of Sharks, their decline, their resurgence in the 21st century, and their subsequent collapse. We join band members in the dubious joys of playing a gig in Scarborough, answering questions from punk icon Jordan Mooney, and declining an audition for the Rolling Stones.

This film does for rock documentaries what Almost Famous (2000) does for rock journalism. It gets behind the glamour while recognising the talent and hard work of the music industry. And it also shows the big egos, personal problems and pettiness surrounding the mythical band Stillwater. Of course Almost Famous had a much bigger budget than Not a Rock-Doc. But Not a Rock-Doc may well follow Almost Famous as another cult classic. 

Not a Rock-Doc is fun. It’s also very human, silly, and sad, and a tribute to creative people struggling against the odds to bring their art to the public. Screen 2 of The Hyde Park Picture House was ideal for a screening of Not a Rock-Doc, followed by Q&A with director Steve Parsons, moderated by Alice Miller. An intimate auditorium. Up close and personal. Snips is refreshingly open in responding to audience questions. He is now using his energy to promote the film to wider audiences and to get funding to get the film on to DVD.  

In short another great Picture House event to celebrate our cultural lives.

Bill Walton

‘First Thursday’ Meetup – Kneecap

Our new ‘First Thursday’ meet ups start on September 5th when a group of Friends plan to see the early evening film and meet in the bar afterwards to chat.

You may have had a trial run at this if you attended our successful Yorkshire Day screening on the first Thursday in August and shared your feelings about Lad, A Yorkshire Story on an exit post it. 

For September we’ve decided to focus on Kneecap, the “mostly true story” about the controversial Belfast hip-hop group of the same name, but there’ll be chance to talk about anything else you’ve seen.

We’ll be at the 6pm screening of Kneecap in Screen 2 on Thursday 5th September. The film is also screening every day at the Picture House so there are plenty of opportunities to see it before the 5th if you would just like to join us for the meetup, which will be around 8pm. 

The band have also just performed at the Reading and Leeds Festival and a 30 minute set is available to watch on iPlayer.

Come along, enjoy the cinema, meet other Friends and chat about films. 

Review: Longlegs

Maika Monroe as FBI Agent Lee Harker standing against a blood splattered wall

It would seem like there’s a new horror film out every week but for that genre quantity doesn’t equal quality. However, being made on low budgets allows for creative freedom which can reach a large audience and provide an opportunity for exciting voices to shine through. Longlegs is one of those films.

Longlegs combines the serial killer thriller with the occult to disquieting effect. Over the past 30 years, there have been a series of whole family murders which would appear disconnected aside from the fact they have all been penned by a serial killer who goes by Longlegs. FBI Agent Lee Parker, who has semi-psychic abilities, is assigned to finally solving this puzzling case, which alarmingly seems to connect with her own life.

Having such a demanding job requires looking at tragedy and the darkest sides of humanity through a cold and objective lens and therefore acting desensitised to the worst sides of humanity. Lee is a very reserved and calm character, confident and determined to tackle this mystery but the growing revelation of how it links to her past makes it personal and so brings out the emotion in her, as we see through Maika Monroe’s incredible performance as our human guide through this descent into madness.

This is sharply contrasted with Nicolas Cage’s terrifying performance as Longlegs portraying him as a satanical Joker and going extreme Nicolas Cage. With alarmingly pale skin paint, he looks the part for a monster and his disjointed, crazed manner of speaking as he recites his religion makes for something so unsettling whenever he’s on screen.

The cinematography is astonishing where its major theme became clear to me through its clever use of tracking shots where it initially follows Lee from behind as she approaches a scene but after a particular incident it instead follows her from in front as the impersonal becomes personal. It also depicts bleak environments and makes them feel so cinematic both in its ultra-wide shots and its 4:3 claustrophobic flashbacks.  It’s minimalist sets with stark lights add to the atmosphere. Alongside startingly and unnerving sound design, it all creates such a creepy atmosphere dripping with dread.

Longlegs is an absolute must see. While it does have some jump scares, it’s far more built off tension, dread and sheer momentum as its mystery unfolds and reveals dark and unexpected revelations. Even knowing the answers, with this being my second watch, it left me spellbound and breathless- a sign of not just a great horror movie but a great piece of cinema that’s grip only tightens and further disturbs the more it progresses.

Harry Denton

Longlegs is still showing this Sunday to Wednesday